On 2012.10.27 at 09:02 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> The problem here is that we end up with an INDIRECT_REF TREE_CODE with a
> null TREE_TYPE in lvalue_kind. Is this possible at that point, or does
> it point to a deeper underlying problem?
It looks like there is indeed a deeper problem. Se
The problem here is that we end up with an INDIRECT_REF TREE_CODE with a
null TREE_TYPE in lvalue_kind. Is this possible at that point, or does
it point to a deeper underlying problem?
Bootstraped and tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
2012-10-27 Markus Trippelsdorf
PR c++/50089
P
