On Aug 8, 2012, at 11:14 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> It's the weird addressing modes that confuse gcc.
Ah, yes... That problem. Sigh, my port is nice and orthogonal and doesn't
suffer in this area, so... no solution from me.
On Aug 8, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:52:28AM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
>> As we move to C++, I'd love for port maintainers to be able to get together
>> and hoist _up_ code from the port so other ports can use it and thus, have
>> more sharing. We make hea
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:52:28AM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> As we move to C++, I'd love for port maintainers to be able to get together
> and hoist _up_ code from the port so other ports can use it and thus, have
> more sharing. We make heavily stylized uses, which could be wrapped into a
> p
> Gosh, we got one of those too, though, I don't know how much worse
> your machine is than mine, in at all.
In the RL78 case, it's basically a modern Z80 clone. It has eight
8-bit registers (er, four banks of those, one active at a time) which
can be combined into four 16-bit registers, but for
On Aug 8, 2012, at 8:38 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> The RL78 devirtualization pass is *not* a reorg pass, it has to happen
> after reload but before debug info is set up. The RL78 does not have
> a consistent register set or addressing scheme, GCC cannot practically
> support it.
Gosh, we got one of
