> Jan Hubicka writes:
>
> > There are similar testcases in bugzilla where we do not devirtualize
> > because we
> > lost track of type promises C++ language makes on memory accesses. This may
> > give us a clue how common these are.
>
> How would the user know without some optional warning?
I
Jan Hubicka writes:
> There are similar testcases in bugzilla where we do not devirtualize because
> we
> lost track of type promises C++ language makes on memory accesses. This may
> give us a clue how common these are.
How would the user know without some optional warning?
-Andi
Hi,
this patch implements basic support for speculation within polymorphic call
contextes. As we are still having heated discussion how much types in memory
can change, this allows us to deal with these cases speculatively - that is,
anticipate that placement news are not present.
This patch als
