Backports to 5.x

2017-09-16 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! I've backported following patches to 5.x, bootstrapped/regtested them on x86_64-linux and i686-linux and committed. Jakub 2017-09-16 Jakub Jelinek Backported from mainline 2017-06-21 Jakub Jelinek PR c++/81154 * semantics.c (handle_omp_array_sec

Re: Backports to 5.x branch

2016-04-01 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 31 March 2016 at 10:57, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:53:28AM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: >> >> On 31/03/16 09:48, Christophe Lyon wrote: >> >On 30 March 2016 at 14:49, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> >>Hi! >> >> >> >>I've bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux foll

Re: Backports to 5.x branch

2016-03-31 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:53:28AM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > > On 31/03/16 09:48, Christophe Lyon wrote: > >On 30 March 2016 at 14:49, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >>Hi! > >> > >>I've bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux following > >>backports from trunk and committed them to gcc

Re: Backports to 5.x branch

2016-03-31 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
On 31/03/16 09:48, Christophe Lyon wrote: On 30 March 2016 at 14:49, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Hi! I've bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux following backports from trunk and committed them to gcc-5-branch. Hi, I've noticed that r234548 shows regressions on aarch64: PASS->FAILL

Re: Backports to 5.x branch

2016-03-31 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 30 March 2016 at 14:49, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > I've bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux following > backports from trunk and committed them to gcc-5-branch. > Hi, I've noticed that r234548 shows regressions on aarch64: PASS->FAILL: gcc.target/aarch64/scalar_shift_1.

Backports to 5.x branch

2016-03-30 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! I've bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux following backports from trunk and committed them to gcc-5-branch. Jakub 2016-03-30 Jakub Jelinek Backported from mainline 2016-02-12 Jakub Jelinek PR ipa/68672 * ipa-split.c (split_func