Re: Backport PR 69400: Invalid 128-bit modulus result

2016-05-19 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > There doesn't seem to have been any fallout from the fix for PR69400 > and it applies cleanly to gcc-5-branch. > > Bootstrapped & regression-tested on x86_64-linux-ngu. OK for gcc 5? Ok. Thanks, Richard. > Thanks, > Richard > > > Back

Backport PR 69400: Invalid 128-bit modulus result

2016-05-19 Thread Richard Sandiford
There doesn't seem to have been any fallout from the fix for PR69400 and it applies cleanly to gcc-5-branch. Bootstrapped & regression-tested on x86_64-linux-ngu. OK for gcc 5? Thanks, Richard Backport from mainline: gcc/ 2016-01-26 Richard Sandiford PR tree-optimization/69400