On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> There doesn't seem to have been any fallout from the fix for PR69400
> and it applies cleanly to gcc-5-branch.
>
> Bootstrapped & regression-tested on x86_64-linux-ngu. OK for gcc 5?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
>
> Back
There doesn't seem to have been any fallout from the fix for PR69400
and it applies cleanly to gcc-5-branch.
Bootstrapped & regression-tested on x86_64-linux-ngu. OK for gcc 5?
Thanks,
Richard
Backport from mainline:
gcc/
2016-01-26 Richard Sandiford
PR tree-optimization/69400