On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > at WPA we currently read trees accessed by jump functions and then copy
> > > them
> > > to remove location that is already known to be UNKNOWN and then keep
> > > copying
> > > them for every
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > at WPA we currently read trees accessed by jump functions and then copy them
> > to remove location that is already known to be UNKNOWN and then keep copying
> > them for every inline clone introduced (and there are many for firefox)
> >
> >
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> at WPA we currently read trees accessed by jump functions and then copy them
> to remove location that is already known to be UNKNOWN and then keep copying
> them for every inline clone introduced (and there are many for firefox)
>
> This patch makes
Hi,
at WPA we currently read trees accessed by jump functions and then copy them
to remove location that is already known to be UNKNOWN and then keep copying
them for every inline clone introduced (and there are many for firefox)
This patch makes us to copy only when expression really has an locat