On 11/13/15 16:40, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
+ this_mask = (this_mask & -this_mask);
Unnecessary parens.
+ if (!this_mask && noisy)
+warning_at (loop->loc, 0,
+"insufficient partitioning available to parallelize loop");
Should this really be an unconditional warning? Is
+ this_mask = (this_mask & -this_mask);
Unnecessary parens.
+ if (!this_mask && noisy)
+ warning_at (loop->loc, 0,
+ "insufficient partitioning available to parallelize loop");
Should this really be an unconditional warning? Isn't sequential
execution a val
Jakub,
this patch applies automatic loop partitioning to loops that are marked 'auto'
and 'independent'. 'independent' is implicit inside a parallel region.
We were unnecessarily still emitting a sorry for the auto, seq and independent
clauses in omp lowering. The main event is in the target
