On 7 January 2018 at 21:51, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:12:38AM +, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 11/17/2017 08:11 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> > Fully-masked loops can be profitable even if the iteration
>> > count is smaller than the vectorisation factor. In this case
>>
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:12:38AM +, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/17/2017 08:11 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > Fully-masked loops can be profitable even if the iteration
> > count is smaller than the vectorisation factor. In this case
> > we're effectively doing a complete unroll followed by SLP
On 11/17/2017 08:11 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Fully-masked loops can be profitable even if the iteration
> count is smaller than the vectorisation factor. In this case
> we're effectively doing a complete unroll followed by SLP.
>
> The documentation for min-vect-loop-bound says that the
> d
Fully-masked loops can be profitable even if the iteration
count is smaller than the vectorisation factor. In this case
we're effectively doing a complete unroll followed by SLP.
The documentation for min-vect-loop-bound says that the
default value is 0, but actually the default and minimum
were
