Hi,
I proofread the code and noticed that in some cases I may trigger division by 0
that may
get different outputs depending on optimization setting on Itanium.
This is what I comitted after profiledbootstrap and regtesting at x86_64.
* profile-count.h (apply_probability,
apply_s
On Jun 19 2017, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> this patch makes us to track quality of the profile. This is useful
> to disable some agressive optimizations when counts are known to be
> unreliable.
This breaks bootstrap on ia64 with a comparison failure in value-prof.o.
The only difference is in gimple
Hi,
this patch makes us to track quality of the profile. This is useful
to disable some agressive optimizations when counts are known to be
unreliable.
Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux,
Honza
* profile-count.c (profile_count::dump): Dump quality.
(profile_count::differs_from_p)
