Re: Add call_fusage_contains_non_callee_clobbers hook

2014-05-05 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 2014-04-24, 3:12 AM, Tom de Vries wrote: On 23-04-14 17:10, Richard Sandiford wrote: FWIW I think this should be a plain bool rather than a function, like delay_sched2 etc. Vladimir, I've reimplemented the hook using DEFHOOKPOD instead of DEFHOOK, to make it a plain bool. OK for trunk?

Re: Add call_fusage_contains_non_callee_clobbers hook

2014-04-24 Thread Tom de Vries
On 23-04-14 17:10, Richard Sandiford wrote: FWIW I think this should be a plain bool rather than a function, like delay_sched2 etc. Vladimir, I've reimplemented the hook using DEFHOOKPOD instead of DEFHOOK, to make it a plain bool. OK for trunk? Thanks, - Tom 2013-04-29 Radovan Obradovi

Re: Add call_fusage_contains_non_callee_clobbers hook

2014-04-23 Thread Richard Sandiford
Tom de Vries writes: > On 22-04-14 17:05, Tom de Vries wrote: >> I've updated the fuse-caller-save patch series to model non-callee >> call clobbers >> in CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE. >> > > Vladimir, > > This patch adds a hook to indicate whether a target has added the non-callee > call clobbers to

Add call_fusage_contains_non_callee_clobbers hook

2014-04-22 Thread Tom de Vries
On 22-04-14 17:05, Tom de Vries wrote: I've updated the fuse-caller-save patch series to model non-callee call clobbers in CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE. Vladimir, This patch adds a hook to indicate whether a target has added the non-callee call clobbers to CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE, meaning it's