Richard Guenther writes:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> I'm about to post a patch that adds an extra parameter to rtx_cost.
>> Since most callers to rtx_cost are for SET_SRCs, it seemed a shame to
>> have to add an extra boiler-plate parameter to each of them. T
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> I'm about to post a patch that adds an extra parameter to rtx_cost.
> Since most callers to rtx_cost are for SET_SRCs, it seemed a shame to
> have to add an extra boiler-plate parameter to each of them. The patch
> below therefore adds a
I'm about to post a patch that adds an extra parameter to rtx_cost.
Since most callers to rtx_cost are for SET_SRCs, it seemed a shame to
have to add an extra boiler-plate parameter to each of them. The patch
below therefore adds a set_src_cost wrapper for this common case.
Tested on x86_64-linux
