On 12/20/2011 01:44 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Ping for this patch to add a prepare_pch_save target hook:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg00273.html
>
> It fixes many PCH failures for MIPS16 (which are a regression from
> earlier releases).
Ok.
r~
Ping for this patch to add a prepare_pch_save target hook:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg00273.html
It fixes many PCH failures for MIPS16 (which are a regression from
earlier releases).
The patch gets rid of some locally-cached state before writing out the
PCH file. We have
Ping for:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg00273.html
To recap, this gets rid of some locally-cached state before writing
out the PCH file (which we have to do because some of that state is
not under GGC control). The patch doesn't change the user's MIPS16
vs. non-MIPS16 setting
Mike Stump writes:
> On Dec 4, 2011, at 4:02 AM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> A while back I added the target_globals structure, to allow a backend
>> to switch between two very different ISA modes without paying the full
>> target_reinit penalty each time. This made a huge difference to compi
On Dec 4, 2011, at 4:02 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> A while back I added the target_globals structure, to allow a backend
> to switch between two very different ISA modes without paying the full
> target_reinit penalty each time. This made a huge difference to compile
> time, but had a drawba
A while back I added the target_globals structure, to allow a backend
to switch between two very different ISA modes without paying the full
target_reinit penalty each time. This made a huge difference to compile
time, but had a drawback: the target_globals structure contained both
GGC and non-GGC
