On Thu, 2013-10-24 10:16:25 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 24/10/2013 03:17, Tom Tromey ha scritto:
> > Jan-Benedict> I'd like to get some comments on this patch, which works
> > Jan-Benedict> for me for stage-1 builds with gcc/g++ (on a amd64-linux
> > Jan-Benedict> box) as well as with xlC/g
Il 24/10/2013 03:17, Tom Tromey ha scritto:
> Jan-Benedict> I'd like to get some comments on this patch, which works
> Jan-Benedict> for me for stage-1 builds with gcc/g++ (on a amd64-linux
> Jan-Benedict> box) as well as with xlC/g++ on gcc111 (the mentioned AIX
> Jan-Benedict> machine):
>
> FW
On Wed, 2013-10-23 20:21:50 -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > When building on gcc111, I tried to use different compilers for my
> > build robot. This machine has IBM's XL C compiler installed, but not
> > the C++ compiler. So I used CC=x
> "Jan-Benedict" == Jan-Benedict Glaw writes:
Jan-Benedict> I'd like to get some comments on this patch, which works
Jan-Benedict> for me for stage-1 builds with gcc/g++ (on a amd64-linux
Jan-Benedict> box) as well as with xlC/g++ on gcc111 (the mentioned AIX
Jan-Benedict> machine):
FWIW,
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When building on gcc111, I tried to use different compilers for my
> build robot. This machine has IBM's XL C compiler installed, but not
> the C++ compiler. So I used CC=xlC, g++ was auto-detected for CXX.
> This led to depmode=a
Hi!
When building on gcc111, I tried to use different compilers for my
build robot. This machine has IBM's XL C compiler installed, but not
the C++ compiler. So I used CC=xlC, g++ was auto-detected for CXX.
This led to depmode=aix, but g++ was actually used later on for
calculating dependencies, t
