[committed] 4.9 backports

2014-11-28 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! I've backported a few patches of mine to 4.9 branch, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, committed to 4.9 branch. Jakub 2014-11-28 Jakub Jelinek Backported from mainline 2014-10-31 Jakub Jelinek PR rtl-optimization/63659 * ree

Re: 4.9 backports

2014-10-01 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 11:22:14PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I'd like to create 4.9.2-rc1 soon (anyone has any pending patches > > for 4.9 branch?), so I've bootstrapped/regtested following 3 > > backports on x86_64-linux and i686-linux. > > > > Ok for 4.9? > > Is the new PR63306

Re: 4.9 backports

2014-10-01 Thread Jan Hubicka
> Hi! > > I'd like to create 4.9.2-rc1 soon (anyone has any pending patches > for 4.9 branch?), so I've bootstrapped/regtested following 3 > backports on x86_64-linux and i686-linux. > > Ok for 4.9? > Is the new PR63306 testcase ok for trunk too? > > Jakub > 2014-10-01 Jakub Jelinek >

Re: 4.9 backports

2014-10-01 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 2014-10-01 5:39 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Hi! I'd like to create 4.9.2-rc1 soon (anyone has any pending patches for 4.9 branch?), so I've bootstrapped/regtested following 3 backports on x86_64-linux and i686-linux. Ok for 4.9? Yes, my patch is ok. Thanks for backporting it, Jakub.

Re: 4.9 backports

2014-10-01 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > I'd like to create 4.9.2-rc1 soon (anyone has any pending patches > for 4.9 branch?), so I've bootstrapped/regtested following 3 > backports on x86_64-linux and i686-linux. > > Ok for 4.9? > Is the new PR63306 testcase ok for trunk to

4.9 backports

2014-10-01 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! I'd like to create 4.9.2-rc1 soon (anyone has any pending patches for 4.9 branch?), so I've bootstrapped/regtested following 3 backports on x86_64-linux and i686-linux. Ok for 4.9? Is the new PR63306 testcase ok for trunk too? Jakub 2014-10-01 Jakub Jelinek Backported fro