This was approved on IRC so I've now committed it (including committing
the relevant bits to src).
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > > - and the general reason for not
> > > > removing the empty cases is that there are plenty of such cases already
> > > > there, some for truly ancient targets.
> > >
> > > I can understand keeping them when there are later case matches that
>
* Joseph S. Myers wrote on Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:09:04PM CET:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Joseph S. Myers wrote on Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 08:46:56PM CET:
> > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > > Why not also remove the line before and after this one?
> > > >
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Joseph S. Myers wrote on Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 08:46:56PM CET:
> > On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > > > @@ -744,7 +744,6 @@ case "${target}" in
> > > > libgloss_dir=cris
> > > > ;;
> > > >crx-*-*)
> > > > -noconfi
* Joseph S. Myers wrote on Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 08:46:56PM CET:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> > > @@ -744,7 +744,6 @@ case "${target}" in
> > > libgloss_dir=cris
> > > ;;
> > >crx-*-*)
> > > -noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs target-libstdc++-v3 target-mudflap
> >
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > @@ -744,7 +744,6 @@ case "${target}" in
> > libgloss_dir=cris
> > ;;
> >crx-*-*)
> > -noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs target-libstdc++-v3 target-mudflap
> > ${libgcj}"
> > ;;
>
> Why not also remove the line before and after this
Hello Joseph,
* Joseph S. Myers wrote on Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:12:09PM CET:
> Bootstrapped with no regressions on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK to
> commit?
The build system changes look OK from a build system technical POV,
with a couple of comments below.
> 2011-03-17 Joseph Myers
>
>
