On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 7:50 PM Roger Sayle wrote:
>
>
> My sincere apologies for the breakage, but alas handling SImode in the
> recently added "xorl;movb -> movzbl" peephole2 turns out to be slightly
> more complicated that just using SWI48 as a mode iterator. I'd failed
> to check the machine
My sincere apologies for the breakage, but alas handling SImode in the
recently added "xorl;movb -> movzbl" peephole2 turns out to be slightly
more complicated that just using SWI48 as a mode iterator. I'd failed
to check the machine description carefully, but the *zero_extendsi2
define_insn is c
