On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 10:12 PM Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 3:22 PM Roger Sayle
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > This patch is a form of insurance policy in case my patch for PR 7061 runs
> > into problems on non-x86 targets; the middle-end can add an extra check
> > that the backend is
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 3:22 PM Roger Sayle wrote:
>
>
> This patch is a form of insurance policy in case my patch for PR 7061 runs
> into problems on non-x86 targets; the middle-end can add an extra check
> that the backend is happy placing SCmode and DImode values in the same
> register, before
This patch is a form of insurance policy in case my patch for PR 7061 runs
into problems on non-x86 targets; the middle-end can add an extra check
that the backend is happy placing SCmode and DImode values in the same
register, before creating a SUBREG. Unfortunately, ix86_modes_tieable_p
current
