On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> Ping?
Uh, yes, LGTM.
(I was under impression that I already OK'd this relatively
non-controversial patch. The effect of having too much open tasks in
parallel, I guess.)
Thanks,
Uros.
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg01808.htm
Ping?
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg01808.html
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
this time, +-* for 128 bit integer vectors. I am using an unsigned type so
the compiler knows that we expect wrapping. I don't know why Intel's
description of mullo insists that the
Hello,
this time, +-* for 128 bit integer vectors. I am using an unsigned type so
the compiler knows that we expect wrapping. I don't know why Intel's
description of mullo insists that the multiplication is signed, that only
matters for the high part...
Next parts (waiting for approval for t
