[wwwdocs] gcc-4.7/porting_to.html says C11 not C++11

2012-10-29 Thread Jonathan Wakely
Committed as obvious.

Re: [wwwdocs] gcc-4.7/porting_to.html

2012-01-13 Thread Benjamin Kosnik
> I went ahead and created a small patch with the changes above which > is the second patch below and committed it. If you'd like to see > some changes, just let me know. Thanks Gerald! This looks good. For the links, I just tried to add them where they'd been added before. Seems reasonable

Re: [wwwdocs] gcc-4.7/porting_to.html

2012-01-12 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Benjamin Kosnik wrote: > I thought it better to get this in, warts and all, and have it be > corrected than to dally around again and have it not checked in. Awesome. Seeing the validator errors, I figured I'll try and help, alas you only left a single one for me -- patch at

Re: [wwwdocs] gcc-4.7/porting_to.html

2012-01-12 Thread Benjamin Kosnik
Here's the page with links, more validation fixes, and removal of the C item. best, Benjamin2012-01-12 Benjamin Kosnik * htdocs/gcc-4.7/porting_to.html: Fixup for validation. * htdocs/gcc-4.7/changes.html: Add link to porting_to.html. * htdocs/gcc-4.6/changes.html: A

Re: [wwwdocs] gcc-4.7/porting_to.html

2012-01-12 Thread Benjamin Kosnik
> > + Boolean type promotion changes > > + > > + > > + The C compiler no longer promotes boolean values in arithmetic > > + statements to integer values. Configure-related code that checks > > for > > + C99's may be impacted. If the following line is > > + newly present in configure

Re: [wwwdocs] gcc-4.7/porting_to.html

2012-01-12 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Benjamin Kosnik wrote: > + Boolean type promotion changes > + > + > + The C compiler no longer promotes boolean values in arithmetic > + statements to integer values. Configure-related code that checks for > + C99's may be impacted. If the following line is > + n

Re: [wwwdocs] gcc-4.7/porting_to.html

2012-01-12 Thread Tobias Burnus
On 01/12/2012 01:11 AM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote: I thought it better to get this in, warts and all, and have it be corrected than to dally around again and have it not checked in. Is the file actually linked to? (Same question also applies to the 4.5 and 4.6 version.) The two most obvious plac

Re: [wwwdocs] gcc-4.7/porting_to.html

2012-01-11 Thread Benjamin Kosnik
> validation fixups... More of them -benjamin2012-01-11 Benjamin Kosnik * htdocs/gcc-4.7/porting_to.html: Fixup for validation. Index: htdocs/gcc-4.7/porting_to.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.7/por

Re: [wwwdocs] gcc-4.7/porting_to.html

2012-01-11 Thread Benjamin Kosnik
validation fixups... -benjamin2012-01-11 Benjamin Kosnik * htdocs/gcc-4.7/porting_to.html: Fixup for validation. Index: htdocs/gcc-4.7/porting_to.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.7/porting_to.html,v retr

[wwwdocs] gcc-4.7/porting_to.html

2012-01-11 Thread Benjamin Kosnik
As requested by Jakub. I thought it better to get this in, warts and all, and have it be corrected than to dally around again and have it not checked in. -benjamin2012-01-11 Benjamin Kosnik * htdocs/gcc-4.7/porting_to.html: Add. Index: htdocs/gcc-4.7/porting_to.html