On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, nick clifton wrote:
> I like the full "xstormy16" as well. I think that the fact that the gcc
> backend sources are in a directory called "stormy16" is just a historical
> curiosity...
Now that we are using svn, you could do a mv and change this. :)
And the following patch up
Hi Gerald,
Anything you'd like to add or tweak?
No, it is fine thanks.
(Is "stormy" fine as an anchor, or should we go for "xstormy" or
the full "xstormy16"? I used what we have for the port itself...)
I like the full "xstormy16" as well. I think that the fact that the gcc
backend sourc
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Nick Clifton wrote:
> I am checking in the patch below to add support for reporting stack
> usage by the XStormy16 backend.
This ass a note to our release notes; applied.
Anything you'd like to add or tweak?
(Is "stormy" fine as an anchor, or should we go for "xstormy" o
