On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > I'd not mention the command-line flags.
>
> I was thinking to point out what to not use any longer, in case.
> Doesn't that make sense for the release notes?
>
> > They were not working correctly and they
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> I'd not mention the command-line flags.
I was thinking to point out what to not use any longer, in case.
Doesn't that make sense for the release notes?
> They were not working correctly and they did not work with LTO
> which made them useless apart fr
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Hi Richi,
>
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > This removes matrix-reorg which is today useless and possibly
> > dangerous. It follows struct-reorg down the kitchen-sink.
>
> how about the following patch for the GCC 4.8 release notes?
Hi Richi,
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> This removes matrix-reorg which is today useless and possibly
> dangerous. It follows struct-reorg down the kitchen-sink.
how about the following patch for the GCC 4.8 release notes?
Would you like to propose a (politically correct ;-) sn
