Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 in 4.9 changes.html

2013-10-03 Thread Tim Shen
Committed. Thanks! On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 2 October 2013 15:52, Tim Shen wrote: >> I feel little bit uncomfortable with "new ISO C++ standard, C++11", >> since C++14 is already there, so I removed it. > > Good idea. > >> Please check the words, since English

Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 in 4.9 changes.html

2013-10-02 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 2 October 2013 15:52, Tim Shen wrote: > I feel little bit uncomfortable with "new ISO C++ standard, C++11", > since C++14 is already there, so I removed it. Good idea. > Please check the words, since English is not my first language >.< The english is fine, please wait a few hours in case any

Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 in 4.9 changes.html

2013-10-02 Thread Tim Shen
I feel little bit uncomfortable with "new ISO C++ standard, C++11", since C++14 is already there, so I removed it. Please check the words, since English is not my first language >.< Thanks! Index: htdocs/index.html === RCS file: /c

Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 in 4.9 changes.html

2013-10-02 Thread Paolo Carlini
On 10/02/2013 12:59 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: We have announced only core language feature completeness, the library was known to be incomplete. And, I think for 4.9 the library C++11 support is still meant to be experimental because of the ABI issues, where we know we'll need to change std::str

Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 in 4.9 changes.html

2013-10-02 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 12:55:48PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote: > On 10/02/2013 12:45 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >On 2 October 2013 11:41, Paolo Carlini wrote: > >>Minimally, I would talk about "improved support": the evolution from > >>-std=c++0x to -std=c++11 meant that we aren't in experimental

Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 in 4.9 changes.html

2013-10-02 Thread Paolo Carlini
On 10/02/2013 12:45 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 2 October 2013 11:41, Paolo Carlini wrote: Minimally, I would talk about "improved support": the evolution from -std=c++0x to -std=c++11 meant that we aren't in experimental mode anymore. From speaking to Jason he's pretty adamant it's still ex

Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 in 4.9 changes.html

2013-10-02 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 2 October 2013 11:41, Paolo Carlini wrote: > > Minimally, I would talk about "improved support": the evolution from > -std=c++0x to -std=c++11 meant that we aren't in experimental mode anymore. >From speaking to Jason he's pretty adamant it's still experimental for now :-) My understanding was

Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 in 4.9 changes.html

2013-10-02 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, On 10/02/2013 12:19 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: On Tue, 1 Oct 2013, Tim Shen wrote: Hi, libstdc++-v3 is ready for releasing. Nice! Is it Ok to apply? By the way, do we need a News entry for this improvement? Yes, and yes. :-) Just one question "improved experimental support" sounds a bi

Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 in 4.9 changes.html

2013-10-02 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013, Tim Shen wrote: > Hi, libstdc++-v3 is ready for releasing. Nice! > Is it Ok to apply? By the way, do we need a News entry for this > improvement? Yes, and yes. :-) Just one question "improved experimental support" sounds a bit weak. I think I understand where it is coming

[wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 in 4.9 changes.html

2013-10-01 Thread Tim Shen
Hi, libstdc++-v3 is ready for releasing. Is it Ok to apply? By the way, do we need a News entry for this improvement? Thanks! Index: htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html,v retrievin