On 04/09/2015 05:47 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Thank you Phillipe! I just committed the readings.html portion
> of your patch which fixes the long standing broken link.
>
> Apologies again for nobody picking up your fine patches
> originally -- please do not hesitate to send more, I promise
> w
Hi Philippe,
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013, Philippe Baril Lecavalier wrote:
> Embarrassing typos, my apologies. I was told to specify that I don't
> have commit access, but since this mention is irrelevant, I modified my
> suggested notice in about.html to reflect that. See attached.
sorry for the delay
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Okay, so I applied this patch plus the one below to adjust
gcc-4.9/changes.html accordingly. (The first anchor there
is not stable, but for other reasons.)
But it should be sufficient to check them before the release and then
one is fine as the links should refer to the
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Looks good to me. (I fully concur that the _002d is ugly.)
Okay, so I applied this patch plus the one below to adjust
gcc-4.9/changes.html accordingly. (The first anchor there
is not stable, but for other reasons.)
Thanks for pushing for this fix!
Ger
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Below you'll find a patch for maintainer-scripts/update_web_docs_svn
which I tested on gcc.gnu.org and the current documentation pages (not
those for older releases) are adjusted now.
Among others this fixes the link you reported above (though adjusting
gcc-4.9/changes.html
Hi Tobias,
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Loop_002dSpecific-Pragmas.html
>> However, some script changes the link to:
>>http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Loop-Specific-Pragmas.html
>> which won't work. Try yourself at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/c
Working on it. I hope to have a patch within the next 48 hours.
Gerald
On October 25, 2013 22:32, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Tobias Burnus wrote:
Thanks for looking at the patch. However, the patch has a link
problem. The documentation is at
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Loop_002dSpecific-Pragmas.html
That's also the link I use in the changes.html file. However, so
Am 20.11.2013 16:45, schrieb Philippe Baril Lecavalier:
Embarrassing typos, my apologies. I was told to specify that I don't
have commit access, but since this mention is irrelevant, I modified
my suggested notice in about.html to reflect that. See attached.
Well, stating that one doesn't have
Embarrassing typos, my apologies. I was told to specify that I don't
have commit access, but since this mention is irrelevant, I modified my
suggested notice in about.html to reflect that. See attached.Index: projects/beginner.html
=
+ Secify [docs] in the subject header.
Also [wwwdocs] instead of [docs].
--
Patrick Marlier
Am 20.11.2013 06:00, schrieb Philippe Baril Lecavalier:
+If you do not have commit access, please send an email to mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org";>gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
+and CC mailto:ger...@pfeifer.com";>ger...@pfeifer.com,
+with the following:
+
+
+ Secify [docs] in the subject header.
Enclosed is a patch modifying three broken links, on three separate
pages. I also added some indications to about.html on how to submit a
patch for the web site for those who do not have commit access, which is
precisely what I have been instructed to do (so now it becomes
documented).
See
Tobias Burnus wrote:
Thanks for looking at the patch. However, the patch has a link
problem. The documentation is at
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Loop_002dSpecific-Pragmas.html
That's also the link I use in the changes.html file. However, some
script changes the link to:
http://gcc.gn
14 matches
Mail list logo