On Sat, 8 Oct 2011, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>> ld -r is now supported with LTO. When using assembler files or non
>>> LTOed objects inside ld -r objects together with LTO then the Linux
>>> binutils 2.21.51.0.3 or later are needed.
>> I think this should be GN
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 05:38:07PM -0400, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > ld -r is now supported with LTO. When using assembler files or non
> > LTOed objects inside ld -r objects together with LTO then the Linux
> > binutils 2.21.51.0.3 or later are needed.
>
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Andi Kleen wrote:
> ld -r is now supported with LTO. When using assembler files or non
> LTOed objects inside ld -r objects together with LTO then the Linux
> binutils 2.21.51.0.3 or later are needed.
I think this should be GNU/Linux, if anything, but then I also think
we sh
> > I believe the assembler code only works with HJ's version of binutils
> > and his BFD ld (not gold) currently. HJ can you supply the minimal version?
> > Non assembler/LTO should work always.
>
> The Linux binutils 2.21.51.0.3 is the first Linux binutils which
> supports "ld -r" on mixed IR/no
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> > ld -r is now supported with LTO
>>
>> Thanks, forgot about this one. This also needs support at linker side,
>> right?
>
> Only if you include assembler or non LTO code.
> Without that it should work with any linker.
>
>> Do you know minima
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> thanks for corrections. This is what I've comitted now.
Here is another small update I just crafted, that makes a stylistic
change here and there, introduces LTO as an abbreviation, adds some
missing articles and spaces,...
Installed.
Gerald
Index: cha
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> thanks for corrections. This is what I've comitted now.
And here are some markup fixes on top, that address complaints by
the validator.
Gerald
Index: changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/w
Gerald, Andi,
thanks for corrections. This is what I've comitted now.
Index: changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.7/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.33
diff -u -r1.33 changes.html
--- changes.html25 Se
> > ld -r is now supported with LTO
>
> Thanks, forgot about this one. This also needs support at linker side, right?
Only if you include assembler or non LTO code.
Without that it should work with any linker.
> Do you know minimal GNU ld/Gold versions that works fine?
I believe the assembler
> Jan Hubicka writes:
> >
> > + Link-time optimization improvements:
> > +
> > + Improved scalability and reduced memory usage. Link time
> > optimization
> > + of Firefox now require 3GB of RAM on 64bit system, while over 8GB
> > was needed
> > + previously. L
Jan Hubicka writes:
>
> + Link-time optimization improvements:
> +
> + Improved scalability and reduced memory usage. Link time
> optimization
> + of Firefox now require 3GB of RAM on 64bit system, while over 8GB was
> needed
> + previously. Linking time has be
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Index: changes.html
> ===
> + Link-time optimization improvements:
> +
> + Improved scalability and reduced memory usage. Link time
> optimization
> + of Firefox now requ
Hi,
this patch adds some info on changes in IPA and LTO. Not sure if I missed
something important. Martin, perhaps you could add some example on new
devirutalization stuff?
Suggestions for less lame explanations are welcome :)
Honza
Index: changes.html
===
13 matches
Mail list logo
