Re: [wwwdocs][patch][OpenMP] gcc-14/changes.html + projects/gomp/: OpenMP update

2023-11-25 Thread Tobias Burnus
Gerald Pfeifer wrote: On Fri, 24 Nov 2023, Tobias Burnus wrote: While I expect more changes, I want to cleanup my stashed changes. Good approach! + The destory now optionally accepts the depend object as + argument. Is "depend object" a well known technical term in that context? An

Re: [wwwdocs][patch][OpenMP] gcc-14/changes.html + projects/gomp/: OpenMP update

2023-11-24 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Fri, 24 Nov 2023, Tobias Burnus wrote: > While I expect more changes, I want to cleanup my stashed changes. Good approach! + The destory now optionally accepts the depend object as + argument. Is "depend object" a well known technical term in that context? And is it "the depend obj

Re: [wwwdocs][patch][OpenMP] gcc-14/changes.html + projects/gomp/: OpenMP update

2023-11-24 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 05:26:44PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote: > @@ -65,8 +72,11 @@ >was extended. Additionally, the spec change has been implemented for >default implicit mapping of C/C++ pointers pointing to unmapped > storage. > + The destory now optionally accepts the depe

[wwwdocs][patch][OpenMP] gcc-14/changes.html + projects/gomp/: OpenMP update

2023-11-24 Thread Tobias Burnus
While I expect more changes, I want to cleanup my stashed changes. Current version: https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-14/changes.html#openmp Comments? Tobias PS: stack variable support in C++ for 'allocate' is pending review; I also expect a Fortran parser update for 'indirect'. Several more features ar