On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> So I guess I have no real objection to removing the libstdc++ page.
Based on this, I applied the patch I had posted.
If any of you notices anything to improve upon, let me know and I'll
be happy to work on it.
Gerald
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> So, after https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-08/msg01467.html I
>> suggest to streamline things, remove this page, and apply the patch
>> below.
> Would this remove the link to the libstdc++ FAQ?
I had actually watched out for that. ;-)
https:
On 22/08/16 10:27 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 20/08/16 20:36 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Our libstdc++/ page dates back to when libstdc++ was merged into GCC in
2000, 0x10 years ago. It has been a mostly empty shell for most of that
time period and hardly seen any updates in the last deca
On 20/08/16 20:36 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Our libstdc++/ page dates back to when libstdc++ was merged into GCC in
2000, 0x10 years ago. It has been a mostly empty shell for most of that
time period and hardly seen any updates in the last decade.
So, after https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches
Our libstdc++/ page dates back to when libstdc++ was merged into GCC in
2000, 0x10 years ago. It has been a mostly empty shell for most of that
time period and hardly seen any updates in the last decade.
So, after https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-08/msg01467.html I
suggest to streamline
We don't use this any more, so let's remove it.
Gerald
2014-06-29 Gerald Pfeifer
* lib3styles.css: Remove.
* index.html: Remove reference to lib3styles.css.
Index: index.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdoc
