On 17/04/16 17:09, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> My recommendation is to handle that via java/index, which is the
> main page, and redirect other GCJ pages to that one as we remove
> them.
>
> Like in the following, for java/status.html.
>
> Are you fine with that?
OK, thanks.
Andrew.
On Sun, 17 Apr 2016, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> Somewhat related, any concerns if I were to remove
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/java/status.html now?
>>
>> ("Status of GCJ as of GCC 3.2" _really_ is rather old.)
> It's so old that I don't think it's of any use. However, I wonder
> if it might make more se
