Re: [wwwdocs, PATCH v2] C++ terminology: the One Definition Rule in diagnostics

2017-04-10 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, David Malcolm wrote: > OK to commit? If that's what the standard uses, yes, thanks. (We still may want to add "C++" in there, unless you feel the context is always clear enough anyway, which I could well see...) Gerald

[wwwdocs, PATCH v2] C++ terminology: the One Definition Rule in diagnostics

2017-04-06 Thread David Malcolm
On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 10:44 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 03/24/2017 03:29 AM, Martin Liška wrote: > > I would like to ping that. I'm not sure what's agreement after I > > read > > discussion in: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-03/msg00070.html > > > > Martin Sebor may know, CC'ing him. > Not sure i