On Jan 16, 2014, at 2:55 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>>> Why did you need the ? It was supposed to work without.
>>
>> The code in question needs something that is max int + max significand
>> real in size, we made the max int smaller (smaller than this quantity on
>> x86) so, this code needs
Mike Stump writes:
> On Jan 14, 2014, at 7:25 AM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> Mike Stump writes:
>>> diff --git a/gcc/expmed.c b/gcc/expmed.c
>>> index ce063eb..720d8c1 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/expmed.c
>>> +++ b/gcc/expmed.c
>>> @@ -4963,6 +4963,7 @@ make_tree (tree type, rtx x)
>>> return
On Jan 14, 2014, at 7:25 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Mike Stump writes:
>> diff --git a/gcc/expmed.c b/gcc/expmed.c
>> index ce063eb..720d8c1 100644
>> --- a/gcc/expmed.c
>> +++ b/gcc/expmed.c
>> @@ -4963,6 +4963,7 @@ make_tree (tree type, rtx x)
>> return t;
>>
>> case CONST_DOUBL
Mike Stump writes:
> diff --git a/gcc/expmed.c b/gcc/expmed.c
> index ce063eb..720d8c1 100644
> --- a/gcc/expmed.c
> +++ b/gcc/expmed.c
> @@ -4963,6 +4963,7 @@ make_tree (tree type, rtx x)
>return t;
>
> case CONST_DOUBLE:
> + gcc_assert (HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT * 2 <= MAX_BITSI
This resolves a bootstrap issue found after reducing the size of the maximal
wide_int; the real code really does want a slightly larger type so we create on
just for real.
Ok?
diff --git a/gcc/builtins.c b/gcc/builtins.c
index 81bb407..f4ffdb0 100644
--- a/gcc/builtins.c
+++ b/gcc/builtins.c
@@
