Re: [wide-int] Small wide_int_to_tree optimisation

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > This patch convers some gcc_asserts to gcc_checking_asserts. > I think the first two in particular should be checking-only, > since we ignore the bits above the target precision anyway. > > Also we have: > > /* This is a little

[wide-int] Small wide_int_to_tree optimisation

This patch convers some gcc_asserts to gcc_checking_asserts. I think the first two in particular should be checking-only, since we ignore the bits above the target precision anyway. Also we have: /* This is a little hokie, but if the prec is smaller than what is necessary t