Re: [wide-int] Reduce the size of the scratch arrays

2013-10-20 Thread Richard Sandiford
Kenneth Zadeck writes: > On 10/20/2013 06:30 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> If yesterday's patch goes in, we'll only need the scratch array for >> HWI inputs. We can therefore shrink it to 2 HWIs. >> >> Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. OK for wide-int? >> >> Thanks, >> Richard >> >> >> Index: gcc/wi

Re: [wide-int] Reduce the size of the scratch arrays

2013-10-20 Thread Kenneth Zadeck
On 10/20/2013 06:30 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: If yesterday's patch goes in, we'll only need the scratch array for HWI inputs. We can therefore shrink it to 2 HWIs. Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. OK for wide-int? Thanks, Richard Index: gcc/wide-int.h =

Re: [wide-int] Reduce the size of the scratch arrays

2013-10-20 Thread Richard Biener
Richard Sandiford wrote: >If yesterday's patch goes in, we'll only need the scratch array for >HWI inputs. We can therefore shrink it to 2 HWIs. >Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. OK for wide-int? > Ok Thanks, Richard. >Thanks, >Richard > > >Index: gcc/wide-int.h >=

[wide-int] Reduce the size of the scratch arrays

2013-10-20 Thread Richard Sandiford
If yesterday's patch goes in, we'll only need the scratch array for HWI inputs. We can therefore shrink it to 2 HWIs. Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. OK for wide-int? Thanks, Richard Index: gcc/wide-int.h === --- gcc/wide-int.h