Re: [wide-int] Commit wide-int version of doloop rework

2013-11-09 Thread Richard Sandiford
Mike Stump writes: > On Nov 5, 2013, at 12:00 PM, Richard Sandiford > wrote: >> I've committed the patch below, which is a trivial wide-intification of: >> >>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg00335.html >> >> I won't commit the mainline patch for a couple of days > > So, please f

Re: [wide-int] Commit wide-int version of doloop rework

2013-11-05 Thread Kenneth Zadeck
This is the right way to fix this. thanks. kenny On 11/05/2013 03:00 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: I've committed the patch below, which is a trivial wide-intification of: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg00335.html I won't commit the mainline patch for a couple of days to give

Re: [wide-int] Commit wide-int version of doloop rework

2013-11-05 Thread Mike Stump
On Nov 5, 2013, at 12:00 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > I've committed the patch below, which is a trivial wide-intification of: > >http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg00335.html > > I won't commit the mainline patch for a couple of days So, please feel free to do a svn merge ^/tr

[wide-int] Commit wide-int version of doloop rework

2013-11-05 Thread Richard Sandiford
I've committed the patch below, which is a trivial wide-intification of: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg00335.html I won't commit the mainline patch for a couple of days to give target maintainers a chance to comment, but I thought it'd better go into wide-int now to unbreak pow