Re: [ping][vect-patterns][RFC] Refactor widening patterns to allow internal_fn's

2021-08-19 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
on > > Sent: 07 June 2021 14:30 > > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > > Cc: Richard Biener ; Richard Sandiford > > > > Subject: [vect-patterns][RFC] Refactor widening patterns to allow > > internal_fn's > > > > Hi all, > > > > This refact

[ping][vect-patterns][RFC] Refactor widening patterns to allow internal_fn's

2021-08-17 Thread Joel Hutton via Gcc-patches
Ping. Is there still interest in refactoring vect-patterns to internal_fn's? > -Original Message- > From: Joel Hutton > Sent: 07 June 2021 14:30 > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Cc: Richard Biener ; Richard Sandiford > > Subject: [vect-patterns][RFC] Refactor

[vect-patterns][RFC] Refactor widening patterns to allow internal_fn's

2021-06-07 Thread Joel Hutton via Gcc-patches
Hi all, This refactor allows widening patterns (such as widen_plus/widen_minus) to be represented as either internal_fns or tree_codes. The widening patterns were originally added as tree codes with the expectation that they would be refactored later. [vect-patterns] Refactor as internal_fn's