On 12/22/2017 02:10 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
You describe the types needing to match "closely enough" (as opposed
to *exactly*), and that may be the key here: what I didn't say in my
message above is that the decl is "const" whereas the value isn't.
Right, differences in top-level qualifiers do
On Fri, 5 Jan 2018, David Malcolm wrote:
> Ping:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg01494.html
OK.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
Ping:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg01494.html
(FWIW, the only other patch still needing review in the kit is:
"[v2 of PATCH 03/14] C++: add location_t wrapper nodes during parsing
(minimal impl)"
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg01594.html )
On Fri, 2017-1
On Thu, 2017-12-21 at 00:00 -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 12:33 PM, David Malcolm
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 14:55 -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On 12/17/2017 11:29 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 18:45 -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > >
