On 05/04/16 14:07 +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
On 5 April 2016 at 13:53, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I wonder if we want an __is_samey trait that checks if two decayed
types are the same.
If such checks become more common, then yes. For now, perhaps not.
We already do it in packaged_task, fun
On 5 April 2016 at 13:53, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> I wonder if we want an __is_samey trait that checks if two decayed
> types are the same.
If such checks become more common, then yes. For now, perhaps not.
> More seriously, a comment might be useful to explain that although
> these "concepts" r
On 04/04/16 21:45 +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
And yes, -ENOPATCH.
On 4 April 2016 at 21:42, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
Tested on Linux-PPC64.
2016-04-04 Ville Voutilainen
PR libstdc++/70437
* include/bits/stl_pair.h (_ConstructiblePair,
_ImplicitlyConvertiblePair, _MoveCon
And yes, -ENOPATCH.
On 4 April 2016 at 21:42, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
> Tested on Linux-PPC64.
>
> 2016-04-04 Ville Voutilainen
>
> PR libstdc++/70437
> * include/bits/stl_pair.h (_ConstructiblePair,
> _ImplicitlyConvertiblePair, _MoveConstructiblePair,
> _ImplicitlyMoveConv
Tested on Linux-PPC64.
2016-04-04 Ville Voutilainen
PR libstdc++/70437
* include/bits/stl_pair.h (_ConstructiblePair,
_ImplicitlyConvertiblePair, _MoveConstructiblePair,
_ImplicitlyMoveConvertiblePair): Add shortcut conditions
for same-type cases.
* testsuite/20_util/