On 15 August 2016 at 14:55, Ville Voutilainen
wrote:
>>> + template
>>> +struct __is_in_place
>>> +: public
>>> __is_in_place_impl>>
>>
>>
>> Any reason not to use decay_t here? In all the cases where decay is
>> different to stripping references and cv-qualifiers the result will be
>> fa
On 15 August 2016 at 12:53, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> + template
>> +struct __is_in_place_impl : false_type
>> +{ };
>> +
>> + template
>> + struct __is_in_place_impl> : true_type
> Indentation nit.
Will fix.
>
>> +{ };
>> +
>> + template
>> +struct __is_in_place
>> +: pu
On 09/08/16 18:00 +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
_Args&&...> = false>
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/utility b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/utility
index 0c03644..e1a523f 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/utility
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/utility
@
Tested on Linux-x64.
2016-08-09 Ville Voutilainen
Implement LWG 2744 and LWG 2754.
* include/std/any (any(ValueType&&)): Constrain with __is_in_place.
(any(in_place_type_t<_ValueType>, _Args&&...)): Use _Decay.
(any(in_place_type_t<_ValueType>, initializer_list<_Up>, _Args&&...
