Re: [v3] std::uninitialized_copy test

2012-04-17 Thread Benjamin Kosnik
> Definitely, thanks! The name of the new testcase seems a bit weird > (for the FSF branches): shall we maybe refer to the original (Fedora > or RHEL Bugzilla, I suppose) PR in a comment and then use either an > explicative name (our current practice) or just a small number for > the name of the t

Re: [v3] std::uninitialized_copy test

2012-04-17 Thread Paolo Carlini
On 04/17/2012 06:52 PM, Benjamin De Kosnik wrote: Found this bug in 4.4 branches, fixed with the following in later branches: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg01616.html But the test case is useful anyway. Definitely, thanks! The name of the new testcase seems a bit weird (for the F

[v3] std::uninitialized_copy test

2012-04-17 Thread Benjamin De Kosnik
Found this bug in 4.4 branches, fixed with the following in later branches: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg01616.html But the test case is useful anyway. tested x86/linux -benjamin2012-04-16 Benjamin Kosnik * testsuite/20_util/specialized_algorithms/uninitialized_copy/ 80859