Re: [v3] libstdc++/52689 testcase

2012-04-25 Thread Benjamin Kosnik
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:53:36 +0100 Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 25 April 2012 08:33, Igor Zamyatin wrote: > > This testcase is reported as failed on x86 > > Yep. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-04/msg02547.html > > Benjamin? Ouch. Sorry about this guys, of course it wasn't thi

Re: FW: [v3] libstdc++/52689 testcase

2012-04-25 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 25 April 2012 08:33, Igor Zamyatin wrote: > This testcase is reported as failed on x86 Yep. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-04/msg02547.html Benjamin? >> >> Noticed that this testcase wasn't put in as part of the patch. Fixed as >> follows. >> >> tested x86/linux >> >> -benjamin

Re: FW: [v3] libstdc++/52689 testcase

2012-04-25 Thread Igor Zamyatin
This testcase is reported as failed on x86 > > Noticed that this testcase wasn't put in as part of the patch. Fixed as > follows. > > tested x86/linux > > -benjamin >

[v3] libstdc++/52689 testcase

2012-04-24 Thread Benjamin De Kosnik
Noticed that this testcase wasn't put in as part of the patch. Fixed as follows. tested x86/linux -benjamin2012-04-24 Benjamin Kosnik PR libstdc++/52689 * testsuite/17_intro/static.cc: New. diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/static.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/static.cc