> Also, Jack, why is the variable called ac_cv_x86_rdrand rather than
> glibcxx_x86_rdrand to be consistent with every other variable in
> libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4? And why _GLIBCXX_X86_RDRAND not something
> like _GLIBCXX_HAVE_AS_X86_RDRAND? The bootstrap failure is fixed, but
Although I canno
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> amd64-unknown-freebsd8.3 doesn't like this, I'm afraid:
>
> configure: visibility supported: yes
> checking for rdrand support in assembler... eval: ${+...}: Bad substitution
> gmake[2]: *** [configure-stage1-target-libstdc++-v3] Error 2
>
> Note, this
On 9 September 2012 20:43, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Sep 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> I've committed the patch from
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg00466.html (with some
>> fixes to the changelog entry)
>>
>> 2012-09-09 Ulrich Drepper
>> Dominique d'Hu
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> I've committed the patch from
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg00466.html (with some
> fixes to the changelog entry)
>
> 2012-09-09 Ulrich Drepper
> Dominique d'Humieres
> Jack Howarth
>
> PR boo
I've committed the patch from
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg00466.html (with some
fixes to the changelog entry)
2012-09-09 Ulrich Drepper
Dominique d'Humieres
Jack Howarth
PR bootstrap/54419
* acinclude.m4: Define GLIBCXX_CHECK_X86
