... turns out, something insane is going on with name: if I use
*c99_math anywhere the dg-require is totally ignored. For the time being
I'm simply renaming everything per the below.
Paolo.
//
2011-03-19 Paolo Carlini
* testsuite/lib/libstdc++.exp (check_v3_target_c
Hi,
> The test compiles and runs if I add -D_GLIBCXX_USE_C99_MATH_TR1:
Unfortunately I cannot debug the issue over the next few hours. If you are
willing to further help I suggest checking why the dg-require I addes and used
exactly because of that doesn't automatically skip the testcase on ta
Paolo,
The test 26_numerics/random/binomial_distribution/operators/values.cc fails
on *-apple-darwin* (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-03/msg01893.html)
with
[macbook] f90/bug% g++47
/opt/gcc/work/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/random/binomial_distribution/operators/values.cc
Hi,
the below is a start on the long overdue task of checking the values
produces by the random distributions. For the time being I'm simply
adapting rather elementary code in GSL, already good enough to enable
regression tests for libstdc++/48114.
I expect that testing along similar lines t