Re: [v3] More noexcept -- 4th

2013-09-19 Thread Paolo Carlini
On 09/19/2013 10:50 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: Hi, On 09/19/2013 05:46 AM, Marc Glisse wrote: Hello, I did not touch the regular basic_string because Paulo usually says not to touch it, but I could do it as well if wanted. If you like, please go ahead, there are no ABI issues in this case. Ind

Re: [v3] More noexcept -- 4th

2013-09-19 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, On 09/19/2013 05:46 AM, Marc Glisse wrote: Hello, I did not touch the regular basic_string because Paulo usually says not to touch it, but I could do it as well if wanted. If you like, please go ahead, there are no ABI issues in this case. Indeed, in the current implementation the move co

[v3] More noexcept -- 4th

2013-09-18 Thread Marc Glisse
Hello, I did not touch the regular basic_string because Paulo usually says not to touch it, but I could do it as well if wanted. I didn't add noexcept to the debug string swap (and move assignments) because the regular basic_string swap can currently throw if the allocators are distinct. boo