2012/10/24 Marc Glisse :
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>
>> let's try again ;) In the light of discussion in Portland, which liked
>> Marc's idea of using std::decay in the unary common_type too, the below
>> seems good to go now, given that there are bad interactions with the
>> fron
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, Paolo Carlini wrote:
let's try again ;) In the light of discussion in Portland, which liked Marc's
idea of using std::decay in the unary common_type too, the below seems good
to go now, given that there are bad interactions with the front-end bug we
have got.
template
Hi,
let's try again ;) In the light of discussion in Portland, which liked
Marc's idea of using std::decay in the unary common_type too, the below
seems good to go now, given that there are bad interactions with the
front-end bug we have got.
Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
///
