On Sat, 20 Jul 2013, Marek Polacek wrote:
> Ok for ubsan branch?
I explicitly have no comments on this branch patch. When there's
something for trunk I'll review that patch as a whole.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
With ubsan, we ICEd in gimplify_expr e.g. on the following testcase
typedef volatile int VI;
int
foo (void)
{
VI vi = 100;
return 2 << ++vi;
}
because c_save_expr created c_maybe_const_expr which then leaked into
gimplification, oops. Fixed by calling c_fully_fold on second argument;
I'm ca
