On 10/24/11 10:40, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Bootstrapped and tested on i686 with same number of errors.
Sorry to ask you to run more tests, but can you also test x86-64? If
there are no regressions on x86-64 either, OK.
As discussed off-line, I'll run x86-64 tests for you since you don't
have
Bootstrapped and tested on i686 with same number of errors.
Sorry to ask you to run more tests, but can you also test x86-64? If
there are no regressions on x86-64 either, OK.
Aldy
The calling convention with i?86 (32bits) is wrong for _ITM_free (and
_ITM_malloc/_ITM_calloc).
Here an example:
0x08049fd2 <+251>: mov-0x14(%ebp),%eax
0x08049fd5 <+254>: call 0x804b150 <_ITM_free(void*)>
Dump of assembler code for function _ITM_free(void*):
0x0804b150 <+0>:
