On 08/05/2011 04:24 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> Note that I did have code ready to have a single statically allocated
> __thread gtm_thread object. However, I then saw that unlike discussed
> off-list, the compiler does indeed complain about using non-trivial
> objects with __thread (which makes se
Here is one try at cleaning up the gtm_transaction vs. gtm_thread
confusion. As suggested off-list, gtm_transaction is renamed to
gtm_thread. This makes up the largest part of the patch.
_ITM_getThreadnum is not supported anymore. According to the ABI spec,
its only purpose was to provide an ID th
