On 08/18/2014 07:36 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 8 August 2014 02:30, Janis Johnson wrote:
>> Running an arm-none-eabi test that adds "-mthumb" for a multilib that
>> uses "-march=armv5te -mfloat-abi=hard" works fine if the test doesn't
>> have any calls, but if it does then the effective-targe
On 8 August 2014 02:30, Janis Johnson wrote:
> Running an arm-none-eabi test that adds "-mthumb" for a multilib that
> uses "-march=armv5te -mfloat-abi=hard" works fine if the test doesn't
> have any calls, but if it does then the effective-target checks for
> arm_thumb1_ok and arm_thumb2_ok pass
On 08/08/14 01:30, Janis Johnson wrote:
> Running an arm-none-eabi test that adds "-mthumb" for a multilib that
> uses "-march=armv5te -mfloat-abi=hard" works fine if the test doesn't
> have any calls, but if it does then the effective-target checks for
> arm_thumb1_ok and arm_thumb2_ok pass but th
Running an arm-none-eabi test that adds "-mthumb" for a multilib that
uses "-march=armv5te -mfloat-abi=hard" works fine if the test doesn't
have any calls, but if it does then the effective-target checks for
arm_thumb1_ok and arm_thumb2_ok pass but the test's compile step fails
with "sorry, unimple
