On Jun 13, 2012, at 2:59 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Janis Johnson wrote:
>
>> The patch for PR20771 did fix the problem (so I should have closed it)
>> but it was undone as part of a later change to the same lines. I could
>> either do that again, with comments this time ex
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Janis Johnson wrote:
> The patch for PR20771 did fix the problem (so I should have closed it)
> but it was undone as part of a later change to the same lines. I could
> either do that again, with comments this time explaining why they are
> slightly different, or use "-Dwith_
On 06/13/2012 02:37 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Janis Johnson wrote:
>
>> PCH test infrastructure compiles each test twice, with identical results
>> in the test summary file (assuming they both pass or both fail). This
>> patch adds an extra flag to each compile, "-Dcompile
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Janis Johnson wrote:
> PCH test infrastructure compiles each test twice, with identical results
> in the test summary file (assuming they both pass or both fail). This
> patch adds an extra flag to each compile, "-Dcompile1" or "-Dcompile2",
> to make the summary lines unique
PCH test infrastructure compiles each test twice, with identical results
in the test summary file (assuming they both pass or both fail). This
patch adds an extra flag to each compile, "-Dcompile1" or "-Dcompile2",
to make the summary lines unique. This is a rather lame fix but at
least I added a
