On 06/15/2012 12:32 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2012, at 11:07 AM, Janis Johnson wrote:
>> GCOV tests for C++ are run for both std=gnu++98 and std=gnu++11. Those
>> options are not reported by GCOV-specific lines in the test summary,
>
>> OK for mainline?
>
> Ok.
>
> It is scary that upv
On Jun 15, 2012, at 11:07 AM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> GCOV tests for C++ are run for both std=gnu++98 and std=gnu++11. Those
> options are not reported by GCOV-specific lines in the test summary,
> OK for mainline?
Ok.
It is scary that upvar is ever used
GCOV tests for C++ are run for both std=gnu++98 and std=gnu++11. Those
options are not reported by GCOV-specific lines in the test summary,
leading to non-unique lines. This patch modifies the GCOV test support
to use a testname that includes the extra flags used for a set of tests
and also modif