Jeff Law writes:
> On 01/30/15 01:19, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>
>> The biggest problem is that what fails and what does not varries between
>> targets and between optimization levels. Right now we have no way to xfail
>> test XYZ for -Os on x86_64-linux and for -O2 and -O3 on i686-linux ia32, and
On 01/30/15 01:19, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
The biggest problem is that what fails and what does not varries between
targets and between optimization levels. Right now we have no way to xfail
test XYZ for -Os on x86_64-linux and for -O2 and -O3 on i686-linux ia32, and
the lists would become very la
Jakub Jelinek writes:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:11:12PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
>> > Linux/x86_64 Solaris 11/x86 Solaris
>> > 11/SPARC
>> > (Fedora 20)
>> >
>> >gcc.dg/guality:
>> >
>> ># of expected passes6490
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:11:12PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> > Linux/x86_64Solaris 11/x86 Solaris
> > 11/SPARC
> > (Fedora 20)
> >
> >gcc.dg/guality:
> >
> ># of expected passes6490 65005489
> >
On 01/28/15 15:16, Rainer Orth wrote:
Jakub Jelinek writes:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 01:42:47PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
2015-01-28 Rainer Orth
gcc/testsuite:
* gcc.dg/guality/guality.h (main): Add argv[0] to
guality_gdb_command.
OK.
As for what to do with guality,
Jakub Jelinek writes:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 01:42:47PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
>> >2015-01-28 Rainer Orth
>> >
>> >gcc/testsuite:
>> >* gcc.dg/guality/guality.h (main): Add argv[0] to
>> >guality_gdb_command.
>> OK.
>>
>> As for what to do with guality, I haven't a clue. They'
Jakub Jelinek writes:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 01:42:47PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
>> >2015-01-28 Rainer Orth
>> >
>> >gcc/testsuite:
>> >* gcc.dg/guality/guality.h (main): Add argv[0] to
>> >guality_gdb_command.
>> OK.
>>
>> As for what to do with guality, I haven't a clue. They'
Jakub Jelinek writes:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:10:18PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> passing argv[0] seems the easiest course of action. As I said,
>> gfortran.dg/guality/guality.exp already does it, and there were no
>> issues even on Solaris.
>
> gfortran.dg/guality/guality.exp doesn't do t
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:10:18PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
> passing argv[0] seems the easiest course of action. As I said,
> gfortran.dg/guality/guality.exp already does it, and there were no
> issues even on Solaris.
gfortran.dg/guality/guality.exp doesn't do that.
The thing is, there are 2 k
Mike Stump writes:
> On Jan 28, 2015, at 4:58 AM, Rainer Orth
> wrote:
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> So the timeout for slow things can be increased:
>
> # More time is needed
>
> set_boar
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 01:42:47PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> >2015-01-28 Rainer Orth
> >
> > gcc/testsuite:
> > * gcc.dg/guality/guality.h (main): Add argv[0] to
> > guality_gdb_command.
> OK.
>
> As for what to do with guality, I haven't a clue. They're dependent on the
> debugger
On 01/28/15 05:58, Rainer Orth wrote:
Since the testsuite parallelism has been massively increased some time
ago, I'm seing lots of timeouts on slower SPARC hardware (1.2 Ghz
UltraSPARC-T2). Closer investigation revealed that this happens on
Solaris everywhere, though not so badly that the tests
On Jan 28, 2015, at 4:58 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>
> Thoughts?
So the timeout for slow things can be increased:
# More time is needed
set_board_info gcc,timeout 800
set_board_info
Since the testsuite parallelism has been massively increased some time
ago, I'm seing lots of timeouts on slower SPARC hardware (1.2 Ghz
UltraSPARC-T2). Closer investigation revealed that this happens on
Solaris everywhere, though not so badly that the testsuite 300 second
timeout hits. The check
14 matches
Mail list logo
