On Sep 4, 2015, at 8:02 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> It's OK for me, but I can't approve it.
>
> I will check it in as an obvious fix.
Thanks, my 12/24 core box will appreciate it.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
> On 4 September 2015 at 16:54, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Christophe Lyon
>> wrote:
>>> On 4 September 2015 at 15:58, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
> On 4 Septem
On 4 September 2015 at 16:54, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
>> On 4 September 2015 at 15:58, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Christophe Lyon
>>> wrote:
On 4 September 2015 at 14:13, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
> On 4 September 2015 at 15:58, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Christophe Lyon
>> wrote:
>>> On 4 September 2015 at 14:13, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:47 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4
On 4 September 2015 at 15:58, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
>> On 4 September 2015 at 14:13, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:47 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:27 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:18 AM, H
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
> On 4 September 2015 at 14:13, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:47 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:27 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:18 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:03 AM, C
On 4 September 2015 at 14:13, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:47 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:27 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:18 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
> On 3 September 2015 at 13:31
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:47 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:27 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:18 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Christophe Lyon
>>> wrote:
On 3 September 2015 at 13:31, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:02 A
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:27 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:18 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Christophe Lyon
>> wrote:
>>> On 3 September 2015 at 13:31, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
> On 1 September 20
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:18 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
>> On 3 September 2015 at 13:31, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Christophe Lyon
>>> wrote:
On 1 September 2015 at 16:04, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
> On 25 Au
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
> On 3 September 2015 at 13:31, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Christophe Lyon
>> wrote:
>>> On 1 September 2015 at 16:04, Christophe Lyon
>>> wrote:
On 25 August 2015 at 17:31, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Aug 25, 20
On 3 September 2015 at 13:31, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
>> On 1 September 2015 at 16:04, Christophe Lyon
>> wrote:
>>> On 25 August 2015 at 17:31, Mike Stump wrote:
On Aug 25, 2015, at 1:14 AM, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
> Some subsets
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
> On 1 September 2015 at 16:04, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
>> On 25 August 2015 at 17:31, Mike Stump wrote:
>>> On Aug 25, 2015, at 1:14 AM, Christophe Lyon
>>> wrote:
Some subsets of the tests override ALWAYS_CXXFLAGS or
TEST_ALWA
On 1 September 2015 at 16:04, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
> On 25 August 2015 at 17:31, Mike Stump wrote:
>> On Aug 25, 2015, at 1:14 AM, Christophe Lyon
>> wrote:
>>> Some subsets of the tests override ALWAYS_CXXFLAGS or
>>> TEST_ALWAYS_FLAGS and perform effective_target support tests using
>>> the
On 25 August 2015 at 17:31, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Aug 25, 2015, at 1:14 AM, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
>> Some subsets of the tests override ALWAYS_CXXFLAGS or
>> TEST_ALWAYS_FLAGS and perform effective_target support tests using
>> these modified flags.
>
>> This patch adds a new function 'clear
On 08/25/2015 02:14 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi,
Some subsets of the tests override ALWAYS_CXXFLAGS or
TEST_ALWAYS_FLAGS and perform effective_target support tests using
these modified flags.
In case these flags conflict with the effective_target tests, it means
that subsequent tests will be
On Aug 25, 2015, at 1:14 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Some subsets of the tests override ALWAYS_CXXFLAGS or
> TEST_ALWAYS_FLAGS and perform effective_target support tests using
> these modified flags.
> This patch adds a new function 'clear_effective_target_cache', which
> is called at the end of
Hi,
Some subsets of the tests override ALWAYS_CXXFLAGS or
TEST_ALWAYS_FLAGS and perform effective_target support tests using
these modified flags.
In case these flags conflict with the effective_target tests, it means
that subsequent tests will be UNSUPPORTED even though
ALWAYS_CXXFLAGS/TEST_ALWA
18 matches
Mail list logo